• 2016 AA Editor Search
  • Open Anthropology
  • Latest AAA Podcast

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 16,733 other followers

On the Fulbright Specialist Program

Today’s guest blog post is by Guven Witteveen. Witteveen is Outreach Education Consultant and Evaluator, visual anthropologist and Japan expert based in Michigan. He is studying better ways for scholars to use ePublishing to advance their work. He can be reached via e-mail: anthroview@gmail.com

main entrance to ethnic nationalities side of the Xinjiang Museum in Urumqi, China

main entrance to ethnic nationalities side of the Xinjiang Museum in Urumqi, China

Early March 2012 I was invited to send a brief proposal for a 5 week course & workshops on anthropological research methods to the prospective host, the Xinjiang Normal University’s Institute for History and Ethnology in Urumqi, the capital of the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region on China’s western edge and home to 13 ethnic nationalities. In a few weeks a formal offer was sent and travel and teaching plans began in earnest. Due to permissions needed from multiple agencies on and off campus to issue the sponsoring letter, the visa process at the consulate in the U.S. had to be rushed in person. But early in June I was met at the airport by an English speaking graduate student and a university driver in a U.S. brand of car. In a few days my classes got underway. But the story began in summer 2010.

Browsing the Fulbright pages at cies.org, I learned of the Specialist Program, intended for experts to visit for two weeks to two months, with airfare reimbursed and a modest daily stipend from the U.S. government. The room and board and the local transportation were to be met by the host institution. I completed my application to be added to the registry and in due course was accepted for a five year term with a maximum of two assignments spaced 24 months apart (exceptions are Burma, Indonesia, and Pakistan where a new initiative exists). My call to China came from their search of the registry, although a project may be sparked directly by the Specialist cultivating a prospective host, too. Whether the expert is retired or still in service, campus-based or working outside the academy, the FSP is a good way to apply oneself to relatively discrete, well-defined projects. The FSP website testimonials show the scope of assignments, but it is fair to say in all cases that both host and guest are enriched by the personal interchange.

Recounting my FSP work begins with the main purpose: a graduate class about methods. Attendance varied from 6 to 26 people representing several ethnic groups and included some faculty and staff who were curious, too. Not knowing the language levels, I depended on the whiteboard and LCD projector to underscore my meaning. Occasionally I turned to the strongest English speakers to paraphrase my ideas. In addition I assisted with native speaker editing of subtitles for three ethnographic films (e.g. tinyurl.com/ashiq2010; screenings, tinyurl.com/dvd2012xuar), helped with English print and web materials (abstracts, announcements), and organized a twice weekly ethnographic film night. I gave the annual Kunlun lecture in my final week of teaching, too. At the individual advising level I worked with a half dozen faculty at the Institute and the same number of grad students to source electronic publications in English relevant to their research. Toward the end of the 38 days in Xinjiang I was invited on a day trip to Turpan and before that a longer tour north to the Altay Mountains and to the Karamay petrochemical center. Pictures and video links are at the bottom of gpwitteveen.googlepages.com/fulbright2012. Anecdotal observations are in blog style at jot2012urc.blogspot.com

The Fulbright Specialist Program connects dozens of experts each year around the world as a useful complement to the traditional Fulbright year programs abroad and in USA. Whether registering and actively seeking hosts, or just waiting for a host to call from the registry listing, the FSP is well suited to us contextual chameleons trained in the fields of anthropology.

Security Measures Surrounding the 2008 Olympic Games

As athletes strive for the Olympic Gold this summer in London, Anthropology News takes an anthropological look into the Games.

Kevin Carrico reflects on the 2008 Summer Olympic Games in Beijing in his article Celebration and Security. He was studying in China when the International Olympic Committee announced the host city of the 2008 Games. Carrico returns to China in 2008 to observe the Olympic experience for local Chinese outside of Beijing. The outcome of such research is surprising. Here is an excerpt:

Photo courtesy Kevin Carrico

In the summer of 2001, when the International Olympic Committee named the Chinese capital Beijing as the host for the 2008 Olympics, I was studying in the former southern capital of Nanjing. Despite marked geographical and temporal distance from the event, excitement and celebration reigned that July evening. Crowds cheered before televisions broadcasting the news live, drivers honked their horns in celebration, bar patrons engaged in repeated calls of “bottoms up (gan bei),” and acquaintances and friends repeatedly asked, “did you hear?” The geographical and historical gap between the two cities was sutured by a manufactured intimacy seemingly encompassing “China” as a whole, while the temporal gap was sutured by anticipation and already rapidly-growing expectations. Acquaintances, seemingly unfulfilled by the present moment, repeatedly encouraged me, “you’ll have to come back in 2008!”

Read the entire article on Anthropology News.

Read more Olympic articles in the new online summer edition of Anthropology News.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 16,733 other followers